Archive for the ‘BizWatch’ Category

Yahoogle... kind of. Maybe.

Friday, June 13th, 2008

Despite seemingly high hopes among both Yahoo! and Microsoft shareholders, Microhoo is off again. The drama certainly continues, however. Yesterday after the market closed, Yahoo dropped this controversial puppy announcing its intention to allow the display of ads from Google's network on its own Web properties alongside its own network's ads and search results.

Among the notable elements of the agreement:

  1. From the user experience perspective the exact placement of Google's ads i.e. how the real estate will be divided up between the sources, remains as yet unclear.
  2. The deal is non-exclusive. Yahoo can strike similar deals with other companies, potentially.
  3. If Yahoo backs out anytime within the next 2 years, they'll have to pay a compensatory fee to Google.
  4. The deal doesn't eliminate the possibility of merger/acquisition talks between Yahoo and Microsoft resuming at some point.

If it does go down this arrangement will however, put a seemingly bitter and probably lasting top-off on the failed negotiations between them and Microsoft:

NO \'HOO for you!

The WSJ (which happens to be mentioned in one of the randomly displayed "Fun Facts" atop Yahoo's press release, BTW) covers other details of the deal here.

We'll see how this affects marketers like myself who tend to be PPC customers of Google, Yahoo and Microsoft simultaneously at any given time. My initial expectation is there won't be a lot of impact on the day-to-day levels. Individually, paid search advertisers will continue to use their decided bidding strategies (e.g. CPC, ROI or CPA), additionally allocating budgets in accordance with where they see the best conversion rates, while maintaining coverage across all three major networks along with any secondary and tertiary CPC/CPM networks they might work through.

* * *

P.S. - Happy Friday the 13th.

R.I.P. me.com

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008

So here I am watching Apple's video on their new cloudware platform MobileMe, and suddenly the narrator starts saying

"Just go to me.com"

😯

This is going to take some getting used to. Not long ago, me.com was an aspiring social networking site eventually re-branded as Snappville.

Now I'm definitely holding off at least until Blackberry's Bold and Thunder come out, to consider buying a smartphone. Aside from how my AT&T contract has been up for a while now... I've been a Mac user since the 512K i.e. half my life, and will probably always stay loyal when it comes to occasional forays into audio production (at least, as long as Digidesign does and/or for as long as I stay Protools based for all that). However, I moved all but totally away from Mac when I joined the workforce and as for their current stuff, when it comes to any computing interface I don't like processing power and speed spent on visual cool factor once it feels like puts fun over functionality. There's something gluttonous about that, and there's a point where efficiency and responsiveness is very much a part of usability, so whenever it comes to choosing between flash and performance I tend to favor the latter so long as whatever attached strings don't include any outright fugliness. Plus, I still remember very clearly how painful it was to migrate my Mac rig from OS9 to OSX. I do find a lot of the new enterprise oriented supports of iPhone 2.0 compelling, still the idea of a ton of people now having @me.com accounts will be rather creepy. My love-hate fascination with APPL continues even if I may not "think different" fundamentally.

Anyway and more interestingly, let's assume that per its memorability and the kind of deep pockets Apple has, the sale of that domain yielded not just a substantial offset of operating costs for me/Snappville as accumulated over the past couple years but a profit in excess thereof several times over. Considering other similarly unforgettable domains that have transacted for large sums...

business.com:	$350M
sex.com:	$14M (estimated)
porn.com:	$9.5M
diamonds.com:	$7.5M
beer.com:	$7M
casino.com:	$5.5M
asseenontv.com:	$5.1M
seo.com:	$5M
shop.com:	$3.5M

...calling it "plausible" would be putting it mildly.

To a certain mate roaming WWDC08 at the time of this writing who probably just made a pretty decent (and naturally NDA-protected) profit there, and to his fellow now formerly of me.com cohorts: Per the nature of the nod I usually only say this to other SEOs, but:

Hats. Way. Off.

me.com shirt

(totally keeping the shirt)

Dayamn What a Week

Friday, April 25th, 2008

OK, someone run an eBay match-up or something on these (2) posts so we can have a contest for which is sexier:

Microhoo: Back on the Table

Friday, February 1st, 2008

As reported on NPR and everywhere else, game on!

Compared to last time, I think the odds of a deal going through now are much better.

WordPress Insertion Attacks

Wednesday, October 31st, 2007

Egghead's posted word of a new WP insertion attack here. For those who had been holding out on upgrading to 2.3, even they might still be vulnerable as earlier versions apparently can also be hit this way.

For bloggers on WP, in any case this would be a good time to have this plug-in installed and enabled (along with the patch one Jaimie's working on for benefit of the community).

Omniture Acquires Visual Sciences

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

From their joint press release to-day:

The management teams of both companies will host a conference call and simultaneous audio-only webcast today at 6:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

Don't miss this. Things just got a lot more interesting (in the competition for market dominance, it's largely them against Google now... In the near term at least, this move helps solidify OMTR's current hold on the enterprise tier).

SEO Cold Calls / Shoulders

Thursday, September 27th, 2007

Got this in this morn from one of my clients:

So, I just a cold referral from some vendor who wanted to pitch for them doing our SEO... needless to say - they put together a sample report to display their skills - 😆 ! Basically it was an excel file of keywords & competitors with a "Ranking Column" that stated "Good" "Bad" "Very Bad".

No, I'm not kidding.

Hope that added some humor to your day 🙂

Also, one of the more recent job openings called to my attention was a thing yesterday, a well-known company based in Seattle looking for an SEM Director. Now, Seattle is arguably as much of a hotbed of Search Marketers as the Bay Area is. Apparently though, all the good and/or experienced ones there are all unavailable(?).

...with our staff getting competing job offers every other day, we need to make sure that we can compensate our team at market rates...
- SEOmoz

Rand, your turf's overflow is felt southward.

* * *

That's one of the things about the SEM and Web Analytics spaces nowadays, if not the Web Marketing sector overall. Just about everyone I know seems either fully employed if not overbooked. While I've got some years under my belt logged in, I'm not one of the uber-badass heavy hitters e.g. the "name" people who are self-employed and/or ceaselessly working the conferences speaking circuit etc... So I can only imagine how many calls some of those folks get asking for their services, and it's a given that they don't place (cold) calls looking for work. They're always working as well as turning down work.

So re. those vendors who are placing cold calls... sure, some might be great and totally know their stuff - however especially in this market, jeez: buyer beware.

These are robust times thankfully, but they are in some ways fragile.

SEO Quiz Master Baiting

Wednesday, September 12th, 2007

Don't take it as gospel or hang your hat on whatever your score is once you've taken this. Some folks are acing it via relative chance, others with much more experience are reportedly getting whupped by it.

There is some definite subjectivity in a number of the questions. An experienced SEO could score high if taking the test attentively, carefully and slowly. The same SEO could easily score n00b level if taking the test with less divided attention, say in a state of multi-tasking, sleep deprivation and/or semi-sobriety. If I were pitching to a client and then at the end of my presentation they said "OK, before you leave we'd like you to take this," I'd be hard-pressed not to think them a tool, moreover one who alas probably didn't grasp the more important parts of what I'd covered.

That said, aside from being first and foremost an example of great linkbait, someone's got to be putting out quizzes like this. Shortcomings aside, it's one of the better quizzes to come out yet. I'd certainly prefer that they mostly be coming from groups like SEOmoz, as opposed to some upstart poser barfing something out that's riddled with inaccuracies and trying to spam it up the Digg ranks as part of a half-baked visibility campaign or something.

As for my own score, I happened to be one of those who seemingly lucked out...

SEO Dark Lord - 95%

Are you an SEO Expert?

I literally flipped a coin on determining my final answers on some of the questions though, especially the uber-geek trivia like re. Larry PageRank etc. ... In other words, if you ace it you should perhaps respectively flip a coin on whether to feel casually proud or casually embarrassed - unless you are or have ever been a Googley personality, officially.

Anyway, give it a spin and then a Sphinn (or at least, consider the discussion started here), but whether you come out of it with a warm fuzzy tail held high or with it hanging 'tween the legs, ain't much a thing either way. Definitely put more stock in how you do on it than you would in re. the basic crossword puzzle in the back of the latest issue of Search Marketing Standard, though.

Supplementary comments here and here (I think a 301 redirect from their older version of the quiz would be a good idea but that's just me).

Facebook Giveth, Taketh Away

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

Again this week arises the topic of the kind of inter-site dynamic that can make for a big difference between "deleted" and "deleted everywhere."

As reported yesterday in TechCrunch, the accidentally leaked code that apparently powers some of Facebook's front-end has now been pulled after a few days' short life on Blogger.

While some people are saying that it took a while for the DMCA violation notice to make its way through the system, I'm kind of inclined to assume action was taken as soon as those taking it knew of the issue. Word is in recent weeks Facebook hired up on the Legal end, taking on staff formerly of a company with a rep for not messing around once it gets wind of shit going down.

As of just before mid-night Pacific time however, much of the freshly censored content was still viewable in Google's search engine cache. At the time of this writing this is no longer the case, but for another hour or three perhaps, the blip still echoes in Yahoo.

Google Analytics + Salesforce

Monday, May 21st, 2007

The Washington Post reports that Google Analytics and Salesforce are now talking partnership.

This makes sense. Both tools are lightweight and with a low cost barrier. Also, Salesforce was among the first to hype up the idea of software-as-service... in their case "eCRM" or, per their creative "No Software" image which cleverly makes software look about as politically correct as smoking. Benioff may ruffle some feathers and/or frighten people from time to time, but as a technologist his foresight there was right on target. BTW Marc if you ever read this, next time you have (now Governator) Arnie over for a holiday party, have him arm wrestle people!

...Sorry, I just had to indulge and pretend there's a CEO of something reading my blog. My "SEO the CEO" gospel is taking longer to catch on than what would be ideal, and I verified this morning that, as expected the folks at Wired were too smart to (re)print any of that post (it was partly in response to their their "Get Naked" story from a couple issues back). 🙄

Anyway, what will be interesting will be to see if this partnership - if it firms up - ends up an exclusive one or not. If not, then perhaps we'll still see them pair up with other analytics vendors like Omniture someday after all.

If I were Salesforce I'd be looking to potentially establish a partnership with every major side-side analytics player, if possible... including WebTrends for that matter (even though Microsoft is among their current users... and hey wow, their homepage is one solid line of code without a single carriage return; pretty intense). As the grandfather vendor of the space, WebTrends is hardly bed-ridden and still commands considerable respect and pull.

But then of course, I'm not Salesforce. I just work and sometimes live around the corner; they're more buttoned-down and also, like most, can hold their liquor more than yours truly (part of why I mostly stick to wine).